If that is true, then how come Palestine as a nation allow these HAMAS militia group to operate in their lands if they want to live in peace? Would that mean that these militia is more powerful than their government? They could have done anything to control this terrorist putting their peoples lives in danger. In my opinion, Palestine is also accountable for this war. They allow this to happen unless ang gobyerno nila ay mga inutil ang nakaupo.
to paraphrase what you posted:
then how come the philippines as a nation allow these MILF/MNLF/abu sayyaf militia groups to operate in mindanao if they want to live in peace? would that mean that these militia is more powerful than the government?
see how myopic your statement is?
yes, palestine as a whole is also responsible for the war. why not? they'd be either egyptians or jordanian refugees if they don't. you know how much land palestine holds compared to israel right? FYI israeli plans to expand, that's the only way to attract more jewish immigrants and increase their population enough to survive in the middle east. when that expansion is complete, it'll be much easier to wage war, cuz no arabs/muslims in their ranks. and it'll be back to nation vs nation, something which israel is good at(they are a nuclear power). but where does that leave the palestinians themselves?
dead or probably a refugee.
guys, lemme ask you a question: would you agree on japan invading korea again on the basis of the royal family is related to jumong's son? and thus the japanese have land rights on the korean peninsula because of that, even though that happened more than 1000 years ago?
i don't. and that's what the jews did after world war 2 in order to found the nation of israel. they were driven from their lands by the ROMANS nearly 2000 years ago. what RIGHT do they have to found the state of israel, terrorize the british(yes, they did. the brits were the colonial masters at that time), and displace the natives there (aka the palestinians of today)?
answer: HITLER
if the allies stopped hitler early on, there would be no holocaust. and no jewish mindset of "we're alone against the world" and no need for a rallying cry of zionism, which is the israel of today. and the counterpart of that rallying cry in muslims is the "worldwide presecutions" and jihad. if people hurt you, you get angry with the world. best way to USE those guys is with a rallying cry.
who is the victim here? who is the villain? both of them.
jews didn't get help against nazis. millions killed. founds the state of israel.
palestinians driven away from their lands, they fight back. nobody helps them. thousands killed. establishes jihad against israel.
palestinians resort to terrorist attacks, thousands killed. israel retaliates with military force, thousands killed.
it's just the victim turning into a victimizer.
the worldwide caliphate is just their version of the west's "new world order" and "globalization" and worldwide surveillance. which is correct? which is wrong? i don't know. all i know is that they're both stupid and dangerous.