Kaya gumawa sila ng ganito Kasi ito ung mas magandang option. Paniwalain ung tao na ito lang ang reason bakit nanakawan sila ng malaking halaga. Edi naitago ung totoo.
Not everyone will believe the banks if they use ATM skimming as a reason for every anomalous online transaction,
Écuyer. As I said, you can only fool
all of the people
some of the time.
It doesn't mean if he is a well trained investigator he can point all the causes. That's why they have this "static reason" to mislead. (inulit ko na naman ung sinabi ko sa last reply). Tinatamin nila sa isip natin ito para mapagtakpan na "ay hindi ko talaga alam bakit nangyari yan.
I agree completely. Not even the most well-trained investigator can pinpoint
all the causes of an event. But that doesn't mean they will fall back or rely upon what you call a
"static reason" if the evidence at hand suggests otherwise. To offer up an erroneous conclusion in the face of contradictory evidence is not only sloppy but would also be well nigh criminally negligent.
Isa pang example.. May binaril ang sundalo or police.. Ano nasa isip natin.. NPA gumawa nyan.. Bakit? Kasi noon pa nila tinatamin sa isip natin na NPA ang gumagawa nyan. Kaya Ganyan din yan.
I would have to disagree with this example,
Écuyer. Personally, I'm inclined to believe otherwise when police or military personnel immediately claim that a dead body is the handiwork of the NPA. This is, of course, dependent upon the evidence at hand; if the victim was killed in an area that is known to have no NPA presence, then that would cast doubt upon the police or military's statements.
Walang pa akong narinig na ang bank ang unang gumawa ng action sa misused ng ATM card. Kung kailan nagreklamo ang client Doon palang sila gagawa ng investigations. Sa credit card pwede pa.(walang Pera sa credit card) Tignan mo nga sa news.. Ilang beses daw nakapag withdraw sa ibang bansa over her maximum limit in a day using her duplicated card. Hindi nalaman ng bank diba. Isang sample pa is ung na debit ung account mo.. Hindi nila alam un unless nagreklamo ka.
Sadly, this is true. Banks usually react after the fact. It would be a mistake, however, to use this as proof that ATM skimming does not happen or that banks use it as some mythical cloak for in-house larceny. After all, don't we the clients bear equal responsibility for securing our electronic transactions? We might well be correct in expecting the banks to take a proactive stance against ATM skimming but we still have to do our part - and that means reporting any discrepancies that we might notice with our accounts.
Safe reply. Hehehehe
I'll take this a "no" or not sure right?
Take it however you will,
Écuyer. I'm just glad to provide a useful resource for our fellow
Espiyas.
Tama naman na may Ganyan.. Pero ung Sabihin na yan lang ung reason.. It's not convincing.
I have to ask: where exactly does it say that ATM skimming is the only reason the banks give for anomalous transactions?
Matanong ko lang pre.. Are you working in a bank?
No, I don't. But I've dated a bank teller or two. Does that count?