@ Sino_one
Hindi ko alam kung matatawa ako sa iniisip mo oh maiinis. Sa totoo lang thinking of planting WMDs to Iraq to justify the invasion is stupid!!
Mag isip isip ka naman iho. Hindi madaling gumawa ng WMD!!! Oo kaya ng US, ang tanong kaya ba ng Iraq? like I said, WMDs dont grow on trees. Whether it be Nuclear, Chemical, or Biological, all require large specialized facilities, complex technical "know-hows" and a huge budget to develop. Kung Hindi kaya ng Iraq at biglang nag karoon ng WMD dun then ang next question ay san yun nang galing at pano yun nakuha ng Iraq. Iilang bansa lang sa mundo ang may kakayahang gumawa ng WMD so sinong source ang ituturo ng US? syempre hindi pwede na mga ka alyado nila, so sino? China? Russia? How do you think these countries will react if accused of "proliferation of weapons of mass destruction"? At syempre lalabas at lalabas ang issue na planted yun ng US mismo. DUUHH!!! Its far easier to be wrong than fabricate another lie that can compromise relations with other key countries. Again, konting common sense naman. Hindi yan paniwalang paniwala ka sa mga propaganda ng US.
You totally miss the point about the other conflicts. The others are legit. They have a clear and valid reason to be involved and the US did not start those conflicts, they merely stepped-in for a cause.
What about Iraq? They invaded a sovereign country because of imaginary WMDs
And the security council? are you sure that the UNSC supports it? read your sources again pls.
France: "We think that military intervention would be the worst possible solution,"
Germany: German chancellor Gerhard Schr�der at a meeting with French president Jacques Chirac said that he and Mr. Chirac would do all they could to avert war
Russia: "Russia deems that there is no evidence that would justify a war in Iraq."
China: China supports continued weapons inspections... "the Chinese position was "extremely close" to France's."
Angola supports continued inspections, but has not yet taken a stand on disarmament by military action.
Cameroon has encouraged the continued inspections, but has not taken a firm stand on whether or not the country would support a US led strike to liberate Iraq.
Chile has indicated that it would like inspections to continue, but has not taken a position on the use of military force to disarm Iraq.
Guinea has supported further inspections, but has not taken a position on the use of military force to disarm Iraq.
Pakistan supports continued inspections.
Syria seems to feel that Iraq is cooperating and meeting its obligations under UN resolutions. Syria would like to see UN sanctions on Iraq lifted.
"
many of the governments that have aligned themselves with the US, despite strong opposition among their constituencies, have done so because of their own economic ties to the United States. The United States has used strong pressure and threats against other nations to attempt to coerce nations on the Security Council to support them."
"
Although President Bush described nations supporting him as the "coalition of the willing", the report concludes that it is more accurately described as a "coalition of the coerced." According to the report, most nations supporting Bush "were recruited through coercion, bullying, and bribery."
Yeah. US places sanctions to other countries who develop WMDs but applied military actions TO AND ONLY TO IRAQ. Despite the fact that there is no concrete proof that Iraq is indeed capable of developing WMDs while others have shown the fruits of their respective programs.
Now please answer my question. Why was the US so eager to invade Iraq?
