Each point is based on another questionable point which eventually leads you to believe the original point.
Yes, it does makes sense because the supporting facts were actual events happened in the court. For example, he claimed the refs even put on money on who's gonna call the first technical foul. Well, before you call a technical foul a player must commit an unsportsmanship conduct. In other words, with or without the scandal, the refs will still call a technical fouls on unsportsmanship conduct. Same thing with "over"-calling fouls on certain player that will ultimately affected the outcome of the game.
Bottom line is no one knows and the only thing the organization could do is eliminate as much gray areas in the rules as much as possible. That's where instant replay comes in. I think the coaches should be allowed up to 2-right-calls per game.
