it's because you cannot dignify and stand also...actually what you said is just base only on your experience. Tulad ng sinabi ko, tatagal kaya sya ng 20 taon kung wala rin siyang nagawang kabutihan? Timbangin mo ang mga nagawa rin niya kung icocompare mo sa iba at mga ninuno ni tsekwang renmazou.
1. Hindi ako nakikipagdiskuyonan sa inyo para pumanig sa side ko. Ang sinabi ko, tingnan nyo rin ang bright side ng rehimeng Marcos.
2. Questions ba kamo? at more questions pa? Eh sinagot nyo yung mga sarili nyong tanong..? Bakit hindi nyo sagutin yung mga tanong ko..?
3. Basahing maigi ang mga pinost ko at if you think that is below sea level, congratulations.
4. Ang pananahimik ay hindi simbolo ng pagkagapi tsekwa. Nakakatutulog din tayo lalo na kung boring yung mga sinasabi ng kausap ko.
Those were possible scenarios on where this discussion with you is headed, not questions for you to answer.
Wow, and I thought you were smarter than that. Lemme fill you in on something.
No one said we/you have to side on the other's either. In a debate/argument, losing does not always mean you sided with the opposing side. Most of the time, losing in a debate/argument means you can't find a fault in your opponent's argument, but you still do not agree and stand by your own side, which is perfectly normal.
If you have arguments that have holes in it, then that's where questions/counter arguments make their way in and the exchange will go on and on until all the holes are filled. Gets?
And so far, at least in my post, my counter arguments were directly aiming for each questions/arguments you had in the first post I quoted from you. You never answered back in an intelligent and mature manner and instead tried to pin the topic towards our retarded president.
How about the below sea level IQ post? From the time I joined the discussion, the post I quoted above, and these two:
ang dami mong satsat lolo! 
Mister tsekwa, anong pinaghuhugutan mo? so can you compare Marcos to your ancestors? Si abnoy?
These are not what you call intelligent arguments. In fact, those who use it usually become the laughing stock of the argument/debate. Instead of being annoyed, I was actually amused by it. I think magister also saw it that way. That's how stupid it is.
Sudden silence, if you look at it logically in forums, means that it could be either he is working, resting or doing research. There is nothing wrong with that. If, let's say you totally abandon the discussion altogether for what ever reason, then the one you duked it out with wins by default, it's that simple. But in the world of the Internet, winning debates/arguments is never worth anything to anyone aside from your own ego. So life goes on as normal.
For the record, Marcos would not have lasted for 20 years if he did not rig elections.
What did my "tsekwang" ancestors do? I don't even give a damn about my Chinese lineage but I'll oblige.
AFAIK, they brought in the chinese decendants that are currently employing pinoys here so that they can get food to eat. Who are they, you might ask. Look at the list of the richest pinoys. Most of which in the top ten are of Chinese lineage. Heck, even marcos was descended from the Chinese (in his case, a 15th century pirate) so yeah, they also brought marcos here.
Also, you might wanna take note that in magister's case (a separate discussion, by the way), he speaks from experience, you clearly speak from hearsay. Which is better? Just sayin
