Yung u-turn scheme nya just creates the illusion of movement. It actually makes things more chaotic dahil bara-bara na lang ang galaw ng traffic. Since walang proper flow and ebb ng traffic, minsan nagkaka bottle-neck, which causes jams. Rather than wait a few seconds sa stoplight and going ahead unimpeded, we are all moving constantly at a slow rate, kaya akala natin mas mabilis tayo gumalaw.
The u-turn scheme is also counterproductive because of one main issue: He put them in the FAST LANE.
Ngayon ang fast lane natin ay yung middle lane at outer lane, which is dangerous to pedestrians considering we don't have many side walks.
Inuna din nya yung u-turn scheme before implementing bridges for pedestrians, most especially sa Katipunan avenue. 5 years after nya lagyan ng u-turn at tanggalin ang stop lights, saka lang nya nalagyan ng isang footbridge between Miriam and Ateneo. Same thing for Eastwood, ang tagal bago lagyan ng footbridge.
While some of his plans may have worked (in Marikina especially) I don't like his fascist approach to things. Oh and he kills trees. For a guy who claims to beautify Metro Manila, that's a bit hypocritical, don't you think? Instead he replaces them with cadena de amor, essentially a weed that--two years after implementation--have whittled awaya nd died.
Sorry, I won't vote for this guy.
