Author Topic: ALIN?... SINO?... NAGUGULUHAN AKO... LEGIT BAH? (Read 3821 times)

olli · « **on:** January 14, 2009, 03:19:25 pm »

MGA BRO, NAGUGULUHAN LANG TALAGA AKO, BAKIT MAY ACCOUNT NA SD? SINO BA ANG TUNAY? SD OR SG? diba bawal mag create ng double accounts or dummy?

zugstwit · « **Reply #1 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:30:20 pm »

From where I stand na nakanganga, legit for two reasons: SD exercised the golden rule (He who owns the gold, rules). Prerogative ng pinuno ang mga hakbang na ikasasaya ng lahat, including him. Sino ba tayo na ipagkait sa kaniya ang kaligayahan to post entries sa forum just like the rest of us, in the process shedding off the virtual cloak of authority? Second and di masyadong serious, 'yun yun eh!

olli · « **Reply #2 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:33:51 pm »

Quote from: zugstwit on January 14, 2009, 03:30:20 pm

From where I stand na nakanganga, legit for two reasons: SD exercised the golden rule (He who owns the gold, rules). Prerogative ng pinuno ang mga hakbang na ikasasaya ng lahat, including him. Sino ba tayo na ipagkait sa kaniya ang kaligayahan to post entries sa forum just like the rest of us, in the process shedding off the virtual cloak of authority? Second and di masyadong serious, 'yun yun eh!

bro, parang malabo pa rin eh, si sd at sg ba ay iisa? bakit sa isang forum ay binabatikos ni sd si sg? hmmmm iisa nga lang ba sila mga bro? matagal na ako sa aite na ito pero now ko lang nababasa na nag iinteract silang dalawa...

Kal-El · « **Reply #3 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:35:54 pm »

Before maging Espiya ang Pinoyspy (at before magkaroon ng division of what we have now as Espiya.net at Pinoyspy.net) SD was manning both sites. He is the one who started it all, or atleast this persona did. Now, when SD took Pinoyspy, he left Espiya with SG. Now, are they one and the same, with that I am still confused and have no concrete answer. But for the sake of the argument, I will say that they are two distinct individuals from what I know. I can be wrong. The ones that can really answer this aside from SG and SD are the pioneers themselves.

olli · « **Reply #4 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:43:54 pm »

eh kung iisa sila bakit sila nag iinteract like two individuals?

« **Reply #5 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:46:55 pm »

iisang tao lang ang SG and SD, it so happen na masyado s'yang playful kaya binabatikos n'ya ang sarili n'ya, wala siguro magawa yun... kaya kung anu-ano na lang ang pinagtitripan. Tama si zugswit, he uses SD to interact more with the members without the feeling that he's the authority of this site, and SG of course, it's more on some serious matter,, don't know the exact terms...

zugstwit · « **Reply #6 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:48:21 pm »

Sa aking di masyadong malalim na pananaliksik, si SG ay gustong makihalubilo sa atin, magbigay ng mga kurokurong walang bahid ng editorial prowess or in the Ilonggo tongue, waslik poder. To contribute in maintaining that veil of secrecy and enhance the sense of mystery, SD at SG iisang lang talaga or dalawang pisngi sa isang kusing?

olli · « **Reply #7 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:52:47 pm »

i think it has nothing to do with his admin powers, he discourages members in creating multiple accounts but he himself has 2 accounts..(if it were his two accounts...) i'm not into something but i'm totally confused... yun lang..

deosh_pilyo · « **Reply #8 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:58:20 pm »

from what i've known... SG & SD are just the same person/individual... but for the sake of some "not so serious" topic & light mood camaraderie... and some administrative matters (which are beyond our understanding & control) they became separate entities... just like the "FATHER" & the "SON" (kidding lang po!)

it's not against the rule... 'coz he's entitled to those extra power... just look at PGMA, she's our President (?) & fresh from the news... she self-proclaimed herself as the "DRUGS CZAR"...

just my point of views...

olli · « **Reply #9 on:** January 14, 2009, 04:01:38 pm »

ok ok rules, rules, ika nga "in every rule, there's always an exemption" ganun po ba?

Master Dave · « **Reply #10 on:** January 14, 2009, 04:37:55 pm »

http://espiya.net/forum/index.php/topic,74986.0.html

Quote from: Seargent General (SG)

Opening dummy/fake/multiple accounts in the forum is not allowed unless with prior permission from the Office of the Sgt. General for a valid reason.

a second account is permissible as long as it's for a valid reason.. I think the SD account was originally made for blogging purposes.. but since he can use it in the forum as well, he went on and did..

deosh_pilyo · « **Reply #11 on:** January 14, 2009, 04:41:30 pm »

Quote from: Master Dave on January 14, 2009, 04:37:55 pm

http://espiya.net/forum/index.php/topic,74986.0.html

a second account is permissible as long as it's for a valid reason.. I think the SD account was originally made for blogging purposes.. but since he can use it in the forum as well, he went on and did..

correct! thanks master dave!

olli · « **Reply #12 on:** January 14, 2009, 04:55:16 pm »

ok, tnx mga bro...

IWM · « **Reply #13 on:** January 14, 2009, 05:09:59 pm »

To clear things up:

Sergeant General (S.G.) is a position, not necessarily an individual.

S.D. will soon come to pass but the position (S.G.) will live on forever.

Madarame Ikkaku · « **Reply #14 on:** January 14, 2009, 05:16:25 pm »

Quote from: IWM on January 14, 2009, 05:09:59 pm

To clear things up:

Sergeant General (S.G.) is a position, not necessarily an individual.

S.D. will soon come to pass but the position (S.G.) will live on forever.

yes... what he said..

GanabY · « **Reply #15 on:** January 14, 2009, 05:21:19 pm »

Quote from: Master Dave on January 14, 2009, 04:37:55 pm

http://espiya.net/forum/index.php/topic,74986.0.html

a second account is permissible as long as it's for a valid reason.. I think the SD account was originally made for blogging purposes.. but since he can use it in the forum as well, he went on and did..

according to SG, he will be using the account SG for Admin Purposes and the SD account for his personal account.

zugstwit · « **Reply #16 on:** January 14, 2009, 05:34:24 pm »

Received this clarificatory note just moments ago from a fellow Knight of PS. FYI lang mga ka-spies.

According to Protocols of the Learned Men of Espiya, Seargent General is a position, not a person.

In the future, when the person holding the position of SG gets too old, dies, of gets incapacitated, a new Seargent General will be appointed. You won't even know who the new SG is, and that secret is kept by the Knights of PinoySpy (our own Knights Templar).

The new SG in the future can come from our ranks (in that case, the "new" SG will be able to keep his normal account) or can come from outside (in that case, he will hold the admin SG account and be allowed to use a normal account for non-admin purposes).

This system ensures the perpetual existence of SG to serve future generations of Espiyas.

The current Espiya Forum admin (SG) is allowed to keep a normal account for non-admin purposes. That is beyond the forum rules. It is management prerogative.

deosh_pilyo · « **Reply #17 on:** January 14, 2009, 05:47:30 pm »

Quote from: zugstwit on January 14, 2009, 05:34:24 pm

Received this clarificatory note just moments ago from a fellow Knight of PS. FYI lang mga ka-spies.

According to Protocols of the Learned Men of Espiya, Seargent General is a position, not a person.

In the future, when the person holding the position of SG gets too old, dies, of gets incapacitated, a new Seargent General will be appointed. You won't even know who the new SG is, and that secret is kept by the Knights of PinoySpy (our own Knights Templar).

The new SG in the future can come from our ranks (in that case, the "new" SG will be able to keep his normal account) or can come from outside (in that case, he will hold the admin SG account and be allowed to use a normal account for non-admin purposes).

This system ensures the perpetual existence of SG to serve future generations of Espiyas.

The current Espiya Forum admin (SG) is allowed to keep a normal account for non-admin purposes. That is beyond the forum rules. It is management prerogative.

thanks for the info! noted...

Bill Clinton · « **Reply #18 on:** January 14, 2009, 05:54:15 pm »

Quote from: zugstwit on January 14, 2009, 05:34:24 pm

Received this clarificatory note just moments ago from a fellow Knight of PS. FYI lang mga ka-spies.
According to Protocols of the Learned Men of Espiya, Seargent General is a position, not a person.

In the future, when the person holding the position of SG gets too old, dies, of gets incapacitated, a new Seargent General will be appointed. You won't even know who the new SG is, and that secret is kept by the Knights of PinoySpy (our own Knights Templar).

Cool.

olli · « **Reply #19 on:** January 14, 2009, 05:59:57 pm »

noted po.

madcarabao · « **Reply #20 on:** January 14, 2009, 06:41:23 pm »

both sd and sg is the same.

but take note that he is the admin, sometimes, he needs to make another account to test what one can see without some previlages to test the website.. get the point?

and same goes with what brother zugstwit said...

Bosleyawa · « **Reply #21 on:** January 14, 2009, 08:02:10 pm »

Nasolve na din ang Duplicity Mystery.

madcarabao · « **Reply #22 on:** January 14, 2009, 08:08:23 pm »

moving to support area

eyclaurjg · « **Reply #23 on:** January 15, 2009, 03:14:21 am »

pag SG ang nagreply sa thread mo, mag ingat ka, bossing natin yan. pero kung SD naman, ordinaryong mamamayan lang yan tulad natin. tama po ba ako? hehehehe

dirty sanchez · « **Reply #24 on:** January 15, 2009, 03:18:47 am »

eto rin yung tanong ko sa isang thread (favorite food ng espiya) na walang sumagot. kahit ako naguluhan e.

Need Help? Contact the Espiya Helpdesk. CLICK HERE

News:

Author Topic: ALIN?... SINO?... NAGUGULUHAN AKO... LEGIT BAH? (Read 3821 times)