Topic: Jurisprudence kay ERAP?

[espiya123]

ano kaya ang hatol sa kaso ng pangulong Erap Estrada bukas?

NOT GUILTY!

[hippo]

Bro sa Sept 12 (Wednesday) pa magre-release ng decision ang division ni Justice Peralta regarding Erap's plunder case. Haha. 

Anyways, guilty or not guilty, I think one or all of the justices in that decision are going to get assassinated. 

[espiya123]

gawa na hatol ng (sept.10) sa sept.12 lang ibaba.

anu ba un??

[vingo]

mga spies ganito lng mngyayari po dyan, ano man ang hatol eh me magwewelga pren pra salungatin ung hatol at khit ano ang hatol eh me aangal hnggang madala n yan s supreme court

[Kal-El]

naguluhan naman ako sa title..."Jurisprudence"...it means the study/philosophy of the law...i guess the word has been misused as court decision...but putting that aside...it has been a long-gone conclusion that Estrada is guilty. It's just a matter of when it will be official. I know, everyone is innocent until proven guilty...but in this case most of us know and feel that he is guilty. 

[Master Dave]

he is guilty of plunder.. no doubt about that.. his mansions, his gambling videos.. that's enough evidence..

[equinexxus]

i agree, he is guilty, because if some1 states that he is not, then no1 should be guilty of anything... tangapin ang katotohanan, nahuli sya at hindi sya nkalusot, un lng un, ganito tlaga justice system sa atin, so no more bitter remarks. let's move on, tama na ung isyu jan kay erap, yumaman na cla, tyo nman magpayaman di ba?

peace out!

[realwired73]

Let's just hope wether the decision is guilty or not, hindi sana magkagulo dito sa bansa natin. Marami against Erap but madami din supporters si Erap. Either way there will be a protest sigurado.

[ssbongbong]

not guilty sakin..


bago pumasok sa politics si erap talang mayaman na sya..

pero napansin nyo dun sa impeachment,planado lahat ng  kalaban un..may pa walkout walk out pa para matapos na ang usapan..hnd pa nga nakakapagbigay ng ebdensya ang depensa..un mga tao naman utouto sumama sa pp2..

[agentorange1980]

tignan natin yabang nya na sa munti daw sya at lang pardon. gnyan din kayabang yan dti na okay na sa kanya kulungan at sa huli nag palipat sa rest house dhil hirp daw sya. He must not be pardon but serve his term dhil me ksalana sya. The same with the husband of GMA makulong din

[chavit]

<<====tingnan mo pare ganito tuloy nangyari sa yo   
umaboso ka kasi sa kapangyarihan mo eh...akala mo kasi lahat eh kaya mo..hindi ka yata natuto sa kumpare mong si FPJ na: "Kapag Puno Na Ang Salop" 
sige magpa bilibid ka! o kaya sa abuyog, leyte ka na lang kaya ayon pa kay Pres. Chief Legal Counsel Sergio Apostol...maganda dun! gagawin kang eco-tourism spot!   

[hippo]

gawa na hatol ng (sept.10) sa sept.12 lang ibaba.

anu ba un??

What I meant was the judgment of the Sandiganbayan Special Division will be handed down on the 12th. There was nothing in my previous post that the ponente of the decision hasn't written the ponencia yet. That was a 300+ page decision (however, only the last 2 pages of the same had the dispositive portion, the binding part of the decision) and by God there is no way that the ponente hasn't finished the said decision days before the release of the same. That's just impractical. Anyways, regarding Erap, he should be a man and serve his term in Bilibid and not in a posh rest house in Tanay.

[boogieman]

nakakalito naman itong title ng thread, jurisprudence kasi in legal parlance it refers to final decisions by the court that are being regarded to be part of the laws of the land.....pero as expected, yung pardon na binabalak ibigay kay erap isang malinaw na pagpapakita ng elitist justice sa pilipinas. 

[hippo]

nakakalito naman itong title ng thread, jurisprudence kasi in legal parlance it refers to final decisions by the court that are being regarded to be part of the laws of the land.....pero as expected, yung pardon na binabalak ibigay kay erap isang malinaw na pagpapakita ng elitist justice sa pilipinas. 

Tama ung defninition ni boogieman ng jurisprudence. Erap's verdict is not final and executory yet, therefore, this isn't jurisprudence but a mere decision of the Sandiganbayan, a special trial court.

[kykers]

I also agree that the title jurisprudence refers to decisions of the SC that becomes a part of the law of the land but sometimes that jurisprudence are not followed with some cases of same facts and circumstances. the SC sometimes changed their minds and break the principle of Stare Decisis

[hippo]

I also agree that the title jurisprudence refers to decisions of the SC that becomes a part of the law of the land but sometimes that jurisprudence are not followed with some cases of same facts and circumstances. the SC sometimes changed their minds and break the principle of Stare Decisis

OT: Stare decisis is only broken if there is a very good reason to do so i.e. when there is a gap between the two decisions and what was decided before is already inapplicable in the present time.