Author Topic: LGBT vs Pacquiao  (Read 27238 times)

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #125 on: March 20, 2016, 10:55:43 am »
Quote
You want me to be blunt? I find your argument weak/inferior and full of misinformation.


alin sa mga sinabi ko ang misinformation?

Zornhau

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #126 on: March 20, 2016, 11:27:03 am »
backread

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #127 on: March 20, 2016, 01:11:47 pm »
so bakit misinformation ang mga sinabi ko? give me details PLEASE.

lawrencium

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #128 on: March 20, 2016, 01:22:00 pm »
tinatamad ako mag backread pero talo si zornhau panalo si evan

Zornhau

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #129 on: March 20, 2016, 03:36:20 pm »
so bakit misinformation ang mga sinabi ko? give me details PLEASE.
Really? Feeling ko ni hindi mo inattempt na i-absorb ang discussion. I'll spoon feed one.
- homosexuality as a mental illness.

tinatamad ako mag backread pero talo si zornhau panalo si evan

Go home lawrencium. You're drunk.

____________________________________________________________

Here's some good to know stuff.
http://lgbpsychology.org/html/facts_mental_health.html

BoyDapa

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #130 on: March 20, 2016, 10:25:27 pm »
Masakit talaga ang katotohanan hehe..Dito kaya kaya may mga jokla chuvanes har har

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #131 on: March 21, 2016, 10:06:37 am »
Quote
Really? Feeling ko ni hindi mo inattempt na i-absorb ang discussion. I'll spoon feed one.
- homosexuality as a mental illness.

anong misinformation dyan?



And why should I waste my time on you? Lalo na kung yung mga nalaman ko ay makatotohanan naman at hindi censored ang mga pinaggalingan ng conclusion nila at sobra namang reasonable at logical? Eh halata namang nagpupumilit ka lng na ipagdikdikan sa mga utak namin dito na normal lng yang pinaniniwalaan mo eh. Kapag napatunayan mo na LAHAT ng mga pinagsasasabi mo dito ay tama at makatotohanan at mali yung sa akin, pangako ko sayo IPAPAPUTOL KO MAGKABILANG KAMAY KO kapag lahat yan may pinaggalingan at may matinong basis.

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #132 on: March 21, 2016, 10:11:26 am »
Masakit talaga ang katotohanan hehe..Dito kaya kaya may mga jokla chuvanes har har



hindi na importante yan isipin mo na lng lalake at babae pa rin sila kahit balibariktarin mo pa yan tsaka sampal sa pagkatao talaga ang makatuklas ng katotohanan pero later on higit na may mas maganda naman kapalit yan magtyaga ka lng

naruto789544

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #133 on: March 21, 2016, 02:06:15 pm »
Masakit talaga ang katotohanan hehe..Dito kaya kaya may mga jokla chuvanes har har

hehehe.. agree.. mga pasimple lang pero you will notice the way they comment...

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #134 on: March 21, 2016, 02:34:45 pm »
hehehe.. agree.. mga pasimple lang pero you will notice the way they comment...



langya yung sinabihan nya ng lasing yun nga yung unang nagsabing sakit yun sa utak eh, binackupan ko lng pero hindi nya pinuruhan hahahahaha

lawrencium

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #135 on: March 21, 2016, 02:43:00 pm »
sakit naman talaga sa utak ang kabaklaan eh, sexual deviation yan.

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #136 on: March 21, 2016, 03:43:57 pm »
matagal ko na alam na sakit talaga yan ngayon ko lng nalaman na sexual deviation yun kaya nga nagtaka ako kung bakit ako lng yung pinuruhan halatang may maitim na balak eh

Zornhau

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #137 on: March 22, 2016, 03:49:08 am »
anong misinformation dyan?



And why should I waste my time on you? Lalo na kung yung mga nalaman ko ay makatotohanan naman at hindi censored ang mga pinaggalingan ng conclusion nila at sobra namang reasonable at logical? Eh halata namang nagpupumilit ka lng na ipagdikdikan sa mga utak namin dito na normal lng yang pinaniniwalaan mo eh. Kapag napatunayan mo na LAHAT ng mga pinagsasasabi mo dito ay tama at makatotohanan at mali yung sa akin, pangako ko sayo IPAPAPUTOL KO MAGKABILANG KAMAY KO kapag lahat yan may pinaggalingan at may matinong basis.


Waste my time on me? Ikaw yung unang nagquote sakin at umatake ng umatake with your Bible thumping immoral ako at moralist ka attitude. Ano expect mo di ako magrereply? Kaya wag ka mag reklamo kung sayo ko binanat dahil ikaw yung sagot ng sagot sakin.

Reason and logic has nothing to do with your posts. Wag mo bolahin sarili mo. Pinapabango mo lang yang mga posts mo using those words pero wala namang laman.

You want me to show you where you lost it? Pansin ko nga ni hindi mo na sinagot ang mga ito.

1. I caught you red handed na hindi mo nauunawaan ang human evolution and you even used your misconceptions about it to bolster your claim. You insisted na dapat walang monkeys kung ganon samantalang evolution and mutation does not happen sabay sabay on the same members of a specie. So obviously mali ka doon lalo na't nadiskubre rin ng mga Geneticists na 98% ng human DNA ay parehas sa mga Chimpanzees and some 90% on monkeys which only means malayong pinsan mo ang mga matsing. You want basis for this? Magbasa ka ng Biology book makikita mo yan. Basis 1

2. Ininsist mo yung ex gays mo and even brought up Tonette Macho as an example samantalang sa interview na mismo niya nanggaling na natutukso parin siya which is an indication na hindi siya straight and the only thing he is doing is abstaining. You even brought up gays having families. Ang dami ring bakla dyan na nagka asawa at anak na babae and the fact na ganun si Ogie Diaz na isang baklang may pamilya does not help your cause. Dagdag ko pa na mga LEGITIMATE Science websites ang ni post ko na nagsasabing homosexuality is not a choice so ibig sabihin malabo yang ex gays mo. Basis 2

3. You insisted as well na sakit sa utak ang homosexuality. I have posted legitimate science websites and links showing you myths about homosexuality to show you that modern scientists today no longer consider homosexuality as a mental illness dahil to begin with wala naman talagang empirical evidence para sabihing sakit siya. Ni wala ngang makapag turo kung virus ba or pathogens ang cause or mental issues dahil sa trauma, upbringing o anoman para i classify ito as an illness. Napagkamalan lang talagang sakit yan dahil hindi nauunawaan ng mga tao bakit may mga nagiging ganoon. You want real proof? Go read the studies of REAL EXPERTS like DR. SIGMUND FREUD and Human sexuality expert DR. ALFRED KINSEY regarding homosexuality. Their findings were crucial to why majority of the members of APA favored dropping homosexuality as an illness. Hindi yung binabasa mo puro mga websites na questionable ang source at mga websites ng mga HATE GROUPS na katulad ng AFTAH na pinamumunuan ni "PORNO PETE" Peter LaBarbera who has shit for credibility when it comes to homosexuality dahil sa extreme right wing views nila. Heh, even the WHO or World Health Organization dropped homosexuality as an illness due to lack of empirical evidence on the 90's. Basis 3

Lahat naman ng sinabi ko may basehan na links from LEGITIMATE SCIENCE BASED WEBSITES either hindi mo lang talaga inintindi o binasa yung mga binigay ko. But don't cut off your hands please.

So ngayon nag rereklamo ka na ipinagdidikdikan ko ang tunay na Science sa issue na to at hindi mo masagot? That's you (religious fundamentalists/extremists) having a taste of your own medicine. It was your kind that shoved your own version of morality into others first kasi feeling nyo hindi pasok sa standards nyo ginagawa ng ibang tao kaya kailangan nila sumunod sayo. Demanding din kayo eh? You showed the same attitude about homosexuality Infact countless homosexuals died and got imprisoned for just being homosexual back then just because of religious standards.


sakit naman talaga sa utak ang kabaklaan eh, sexual deviation yan.

Nakagamit lang ng fancy words sakit na kaagad. :P

matagal ko na alam na sakit talaga yan ngayon ko lng nalaman na sexual deviation yun kaya nga nagtaka ako kung bakit ako lng yung pinuruhan halatang may maitim na balak eh

Ako pa maitim ang balak ikaw to'ng unang nag quote at nag challenge sakin, si Senjuu kausap ko eh. NAPASUBO ka lang at di mo inasahan binangga mo. Now suck it like Stoya!  ::laffman
____________________________________________________________

Fun fact. You won't be enjoying your computers and mobile phones today if it wasn't for Alan Turing. Someone who was not accepted by his own people by just being himself.

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #138 on: March 22, 2016, 07:10:28 am »
And why such websites like AFTAH are called "HATE GROUPS"?? kasi sa nakita ko, yung mga sources ng AFTAH kung pagsasamahin mo lahat bumabagsak sa isang source din nila at yung source nila na yun never nagkamali, precise and accurate lahat ng nakalagay dun sa iisang source na sinasabi ko, matatag na ebidensya yan.

At bakit tinanggal sa DSM-2 ng APA ang same-sex attraction disorder? meron ba silang mga scientific studies nyan na nagpatunay na hindi yun mental disorder at kinakailangan tanggalin sa DSM-2??
 
malabo ang mga ex-gays sources ko? baka gusto mo sanang i-google muna lahat ng testimonials ng ex-gays hindi lng dito sa pilipinas marami pa nyan sa north and south america, si tonnette macho kabilang lng sya sa kanila and most of them................................mamaya ko na lng sasabihin 


FYI, nakita ko na rin dati pa yung mga links na sinasabi mo sa akin kaso hindi ako kuntento sa mga nakalagay, parang may mali


just get it straight na lng kasi sa mga sagot, bawal pikon................nagtatanong lng naman ako ng maayos eh, malamang nanghihingi lng ako ng sagot sayo.

Zornhau

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #139 on: March 27, 2016, 12:30:59 am »

Quote
And why such websites like AFTAH are called "HATE GROUPS"?? kasi sa nakita ko, yung mga sources ng AFTAH kung pagsasamahin mo lahat bumabagsak sa isang source din nila at yung source nila na yun never nagkamali, precise and accurate lahat ng nakalagay dun sa iisang source na sinasabi ko, matatag na ebidensya yan.

Malice, misinformation, bigotry. Twisting facts for their own belief, claiming syphilis as a new gay disease so people would fear them. Supporting Uganda's anti gay law dubbed as "kill the gays" law. etc

Quote
At bakit tinanggal sa DSM-2 ng APA ang same-sex attraction disorder? meron ba silang mga scientific studies nyan na nagpatunay na hindi yun mental disorder at kinakailangan tanggalin sa DSM-2??

Who do you think removed it from the DSMs if not majority of APA? Who are all scientists specializing on the issue. Do you think they can make such a big move without basis?

Why would you think it is the pro homosexuals who need to prove homosexuality is not a disease? When it is the other way around. It is those who claim it as a disease who need to prove it. Up until this day no empirical evidence has been presented to maintain homosexuality as a mental disorder.

There is no need to maintain it as a mental disorder. For one, it does not possess qualities of a mental disorder.

Homosexuality does not present a clear threat to oneself and people around them. It does not cause suffering nor impairment to the homosexual and they can function normally on their daily lives. All of the disorders in the DSMs do not have these characteristics. Therefore no need to consider it as a disorder nor maintain it in the lists of the DSMs.
 

Quote
malabo ang mga ex-gays sources ko? baka gusto mo sanang i-google muna lahat ng testimonials ng ex-gays hindi lng dito sa pilipinas marami pa nyan sa north and south america, si tonnette macho kabilang lng sya sa kanila and most of them................................mamaya ko na lng sasabihin 

And before you start posting stuff. Intindihin mo muna yung previous posts ko. You obviously do not understand my previous posts. Paulit ulit ka na.


Quote
FYI, nakita ko na rin dati pa yung mga links na sinasabi mo sa akin kaso hindi ako kuntento sa mga nakalagay, parang may mali

A clear indication of bias. You'd rather believe everything Peter LaBarbera says who does not have the support of the scientific community and intellectuals then you would question scientific facts provided by the scientific community that does not agree with your views. If you think scientists are incorrect with indicating that homosexuality isn't normal then go argue with them.

Quote
just get it straight na lng kasi sa mga sagot, bawal pikon................nagtatanong lng naman ako ng maayos eh, malamang nanghihingi lng ako ng sagot sayo.

Me pikon? I'm all laughs here.  ::laffman
Nagtatanong ka lang ng maayos? Your bigotry and condemnation showed during the discussion. Branding me satanist and immoral etc. Reviewing your own posts will contradict you.

The only negativity I have here is nakakapagod ka kausap lalo na't I'm working a 10 hour job. Paulit ulit hindi naiintindihan posts ko. I feel like I'm teaching you for free and you do not even give an effort to understand my posts then people are suspecting me of being a homosexual when I'm not. Nagkataon lang na ayaw ko na kumakalat ang misinformation.

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #140 on: March 27, 2016, 06:09:43 am »
kalokohan mo.......ang sabihin mo kamo nakakita ka lng dun ng maraming BIBLICAL SOURCES. tama ako o mali??

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #141 on: March 27, 2016, 06:21:42 am »
ang totoo kasi nyan, wala akong pakialam sa mga pinagsasasbi mo at sa nararamdaman mo.......impormasyon lng kailangan ko sayo but then pinapaikot mo lng ako sa mga sources na gusto mo lng ipakita sakin at gusto mong ipapaniwala sakin so, useless.

Zornhau

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #142 on: March 29, 2016, 04:09:10 am »
kalokohan mo.......ang sabihin mo kamo nakakita ka lng dun ng maraming BIBLICAL SOURCES. tama ako o mali??

Nope. Don't give a frakk about them Bible quotes. Health and science kuno section is my personal favorite. It's like misinformation.. Misinformation everywhere!  ::laffman

ang totoo kasi nyan, wala akong pakialam sa mga pinagsasasbi mo at sa nararamdaman mo.......impormasyon lng kailangan ko sayo but then pinapaikot mo lng ako sa mga sources na gusto mo lng ipakita sakin at gusto mong ipapaniwala sakin so, useless.

Wait whuut? Wala ka pakialam sa sinasabi ko pero kailangan mo ng impormasyon galing sakin?  o_____O
Parang may mali ah.

So ako pa pala ang nagpapaikot ikot samantalang ako to'ng spoonfeed ng spoonfeed ng information at dagdag ng dagdag ng detalye habang lahat iniiwasan mo.

Ipapaniwala sayo? No sir. Convincing you is not my objective. Exposing your mistake is my objective. There's no point in convincing someone who has blind faith to Saint Peter LaBarbero lalo na't well indoctrinated to bigotry and takes everything fundamentalists say for granted.

--------

The only way for me is to stand up to their bigotry and misinformation; to shake their blind faith so the cracks will show. That way truth can seep in.

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #143 on: March 29, 2016, 07:13:52 am »
Para masabi mong misinformed sila dapat alam mong mali LAHAT ng mga sources nila, and that includes the bible itself. Alam mo dapat ang kabuuan ng bibliya para masbi mong misinformed yung website dahil kasama yan sa mga sources nila.

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #144 on: April 09, 2016, 11:59:32 am »
O? bakit bigla ka yata nanahimik nung sinabi ko lng na dapat alam mo buong bibliya para mapatunayang mali? Tindi rin ng apog mo eh noh

lawrencium

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #145 on: April 09, 2016, 12:01:49 pm »
talo na si zornhau ::laffman

evan-r91

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #146 on: April 09, 2016, 12:31:41 pm »
ewan ko ba dyan sabi nya THEISTIC AGNOSTIC daw sya aalamin ko rin nga kung totoo yun eh.............

Zornhau

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #147 on: April 10, 2016, 07:19:40 am »
O? bakit bigla ka yata nanahimik nung sinabi ko lng na dapat alam mo buong bibliya para mapatunayang mali? Tindi rin ng apog mo eh noh

Do you know why I didn't bother replying? It's a non sense post that I find no good reason to reply to. Sige nga how can you relate your previous posts to Labarbera's claims like Homosexuality is more dangerous than cigarettes? How can you use the Bible to justify his claims like HIV is a gay disease when it is clear that the virus can jump to any human regardless of gender?

Tindi rin ng apog ko? Resorting to personal attacks again?

And oh.. I saw ni-edit mo yung last post mo na di ko nireply-an. Would have been much more fun if you did not edit it.

------------------------------------------------------------

Hindi porque ikaw ang huling nagpost ay nangangahulugang ikaw ang tama.

lawrencium

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #148 on: April 10, 2016, 07:45:15 am »
zornhau kumalma ka lang umiiyak ka na e

Zornhau

Re: LGBT vs Pacquiao
« Reply #149 on: April 10, 2016, 07:51:01 am »
zornhau kumalma ka lang umiiyak ka na e

Me iiyakan yang 1960s full of misconceptions na paniniwala ninyo? Baka nga maiyak ako out of pity. But you gotta' try harder kung gusto mo ko mainsulto.  ::laffman