There's no need for me to prove anything because based on your own definition of EJK, the current war on drugs is EJK by itself. Unless you will change your statement again that is.
Your descriptionAs you have noted there are a lot of incidents last year na sinasabi nang pulis na nanlaban yung napatay while witnesses say otherwise. But still they are supported by the government so by your own definition those are EJKs. So either you support EJK but are just anticorry, or you don't support EJK and you're just a Dutertard follower.
And just to be clear again, I do not care whether it's EJK or not since I personally believe na as long as true criminals are killed kahit legit operation pa yan o salvage ok lang. I'm also not pro Cory cause I think she and her son were incompetents who started the decline of this country a few decades ago. You can try to check all my anti duterte posts and you will see that my reason for disliking him lies mainly on totally different matters.
Bro, i specifically said for the record, if duterte is the one in this issue i would be against it. Sorry for replying again but thats just wrong for thinking im a blind follower... im pro duterte on some of his acts sure, but i dislike how he runs his mouth for one reason... he is tactless most of the time, but still the results he is making is mostly positive.
How is "nanlaban" and got killed for it considered ejk? Its not. You always have the premise that the "nanlaban" clause is just an excuse to kill outright so its still ejk for you no matter what. If you firmly believe every kill during the operations is ejk then we are just going in circles...
The govt is ok with deaths that are reasonable not the one with ejk incidents. Dont mix them up.
Some samples for you.
Articles regarding airstrikes against the Maute group last year. One from September another from November.
This one from March 2015 against the BIFF
Here is a news clip from GMA News during the Zamboanga Siege. Footage shows PAF aircrafts in action.
Thanks for this. Please take a look at this too.http://asianjournal.com/news/at-least-84-dead-in-syria-from-us-led-airstrikes/
I understand why they have to airstrike but see the result. Even if the intention was good there are bound to have collateral damages beyond their control, so forgive me for thinking that doing airstrikes are bad in general.
Im glad no report of civilian casualties from your sources.