Anyone else find this kind of fanboyism absurd?
Seriously, fanboyism started way back when kids can't afford multiple platforms. It's not like they'll say "mommy, mommy, buy me a Sega Genesis" one day and "mommy, mommy, buy me a Nintendo SNES" the next. They had to stick with one console... one brand... and justify their purchase with ardent rationalization.
Hence the birth of the fanboy, the operative word being much as "boy" as it is as "fan."
Nowadays, the gamers of decades ago have grown up and started to earn. Console prices have stabilized with current economic valuation. Most gamers CAN afford multiple systems.
The success of multiple platforms can only mean well for ALL GAMERS.
Not only that, the success of multiple platforms can only mean well for MANY PEOPLE. No video game companies have to cut cost and lay off hundreds of workers. Developers will find more profit and be inspired to create better games. The industry will blossom, and will create more job opportunities for more people, and more choices for avid consumers.
So...
Why spell doom and gloom for one console just to elevate another?
Can't we just wish all video game brands, and all companies related to them, the best?
After all, it is the scenario that will benefit everybody.
If you can't see it this way, then I'm sorry to say, the fanboy must find ways to become a man.
P.S. also, when you say "nuff said" which is a geeky abbreviation for "enough said" popularized by 4th wall breaking editorial notes in Marvel comic issues in the seventies, you do mean "enough said," and by saying something more, you'll just be contradicting yourself. After all, how can you say "nuff said" when you'll post another message adding to what you already said? That would only mean that what was described as "nuff said" is, in actually, not enough.