@Ryuji-san - First of, I got my opinion and codered got his or her. Obviously, our opinions are different. I'm questioning his opinions because its different from mine or in other words I don't fully understand his or her opinion. What do I do about it? I ask her questions. I don't shut up and let it go. I want to understand and know where he or she is coming from or from what he or she base his or her opinion. And I'm fully confident he or she can explain it.
What I don't do is post a none-sense and ass kissing background comment that the world will go on without.
@codered - Yes, I do know that Mayweather is asking too much. I also think the current tests the NSAC conducts is suffucient and there's no reason or evidence to tighten up. Also to your second point, Pacquiao never said he will submit himself to bloodtest Mayweather's camp demands. So, he don't quite get there. And last point and my second time to repeat this, I'm not talking about the Mayweather and Pacquiao negotiations. I'm talking about demands, give and take in relevance to popular, moral, ethical highground.
First of, your first paragraph states that you are having trouble identifying my gender (which sometimes Im having doubts if you are really using that green skull matter of yours or you just good in talking too much) if you look on the Gender icon, it clearly suggests that I am a HE. On the other hand, if that is your own way of insinuating a question on my being a male person, I think I seldom post a lot of talks or trash around here unlike someone I know who talks too much. That I think is way too girly like
. Ofcourse I am not referring to you right?
-------
Second, since you said you are having trouble understanding my point let me break it down to you into parts.
1. First you said, "
Those two cases are mostly likely the same in the sense they went against moral, popular or ethical flow and decides to do what's right for themselves." re: blood testing and catch-weight
2. Then I said, "A catch-weight
is different in a sense that, ofcourse, physically its obvious when two person step up in the ring, it is necessary to level things on a fair ground. We don't want to see a David vs. Goliath fight don't we?
3. Then you came up with, @codered -
A in-and-out of the ring blood & urine tests are different in a sense that, ofcourse, physically its obvious when two person step up in the ring, it is necessary to level things on a fair ground. We don't want to see a David vs. Goliath fight don't we?Look at how general your statement was? I suggest you think of more specific support statements.
You replace the catch-weight
with A in-and-out of the ring blood & urine tests when I already said the two are different cases (where your argument is they are the same). If you are going to analyze it you are interjecting your idea to my original statement and make it sound like an awful one and put it as if it was my idea where in fact it is you in the first place that the two arguments are the same.
And lastly in your last point, do you think the pound for pound king having 7 world titles will bow in the demand if the demand is nothing like but a way of questioning how he get to beat his foes...tested negative on drug substance in his entire career. Pacquiao will submit to blood testing... but not to Mayweather's terms who has a questionable moral and ethical background.
