Hindi naman dapat na i-base lang sa stats kung sino yung dapat manalo unless sobrang laki ng gap katulad nung sa Mayweather - Dela Hoya. Ikaw na rin nagsabi, nasira ni Marquez yung rhythm ni Pacquiao. Kinulang nga lang sa stamina after ng 9th round. At ano ibig sabihin nun? Naging effective yung style ni Marquez at nagawan ba ng paraan ni Pacquiao yun? Hindi.
------
Yang sentiment ni Pacquiao ang hindi ko maintindihan.
People criticize his performance as a boxer so why brought up an issue that is both non-existent and completely irrelevant? This isn't a case of crab mentality because no one is bashing him senselessly.
It's also EXTREMELY STUPID of him especially him being a politician to expect every Filipino to just go along and ignore whatever they find to be wrong just because of having the same nationality. That's just rubbish.
dun tayo nagkakatalo. it's a calculated sport. kung suntukan lang yan sa kanto baka applicable yan.
stats are the most objective measure of any game, it really should matter.
wether you score a regular lay up or a very hard dunk, just the same -2 pts. hindi pwede manalo ang 99 dunks over 104 layups.
fairly speaking - they both outlasted each other. if JMM's stamina and punches we're good enough PACMAN should've been knocked down. and vice versa - if MP's punches were any better...
ergo it should all boil down to the stats.
all forms of critics are welcomed by him as long as they're based on facts not just speculations. facts are reflected by the stats. we watched the game on TV but the officials were there LIVE. again. nagmamagaling nanaman tayo versus the rules of the game, the judges and the compubox itself. magaling na magaling na tayong lahat sa boxing.
non-believers: mabuhay tayong lahat at magdusa ka manny dahil mas magaling kami magscore sa boxing kaysa sayo at sa judges haha. (sarcasm)
mas mabenta kasi sa mga tao ang masamang hakahaka kaysa sa wastong balita.