Topic: Earn Passive Income Online

[jologz]

Good stable job is a thing of the past. With the way the economy is going, price hikes, companies closing down, natural disasters and calamities, you can never be secured with your fixed income.

What if someone in the family got sick? If there is an increase in tuition fee?  A typhoon that destroyed your house?

Can your fixed monthly income still accomodate all the expenses needed for these situations?

What are you going to do? Get a LOAN? Ask HELP from your family? Drive your self into more DEBT?

Why not as early as now TAKE ACTION and find a way to get PASSIVE INCOME?

How? Online jobs so you could just work at home so you can make online income!!


Earn Online Income!
Avoid future and solve existing MONEY PROBLEMS by earning Passive Income!!
How?
Well, start a part-time business while working!
I know you are thinking that it needs big capital plus you don't have time to set up a business.
But, what if I tell you that you can start a part-time business with a small  capital and it would only take 2 hours of your time you can work at home while having fun infront of the computer!!

Wanna learn more?

Visit www.swaultimate.co

[sweetbayag2]

wow. puede ako jan 

[blu3boxers]

Good, stable job, is the thing of the past? Really?

[VeilSpy]

Good, stable job, is the thing of the past? Really?

Yes. unless taga pag mana ka ng isang oil rig siguro.

[jologz]

Yes. unless taga pag mana ka ng isang oil rig siguro.

Correct. San ka makakakita ng mga mahihirap na tao? Sa makati at ortigas madami. Kasi once na mahinto sila sa trabaho wala na silang kakainin. Malaki nga sweldo habang nagtatrabaho pero pag magkasakit at di na pwede san sila kukuha ng pangkain? At lalong hindi pwedeng forever ka na lang empleyado. Asa na lang sa family o mga anak pag matanda na.

[Ilonggo-by-blood]

Yes. unless taga pag mana ka ng isang oil rig siguro.

"Good stable job is a thing of the past"

Good stable Job is still a good stable Job.

It can NOT be a thing of the past. President ng GSIS is a good stable Job. Judges Doctors lawyers teachers.  If Good stable jobs is a thing of the past wala na tayung schools teaching economics, Marketing, Math Science etc etc.

Correct. San ka makakakita ng mga mahihirap na tao? Sa makati at ortigas madami. Kasi once na mahinto sila sa trabaho wala na silang kakainin. Malaki nga sweldo habang nagtatrabaho pero pag magkasakit at di na pwede san sila kukuha ng pangkain? At lalong hindi pwedeng forever ka na lang empleyado. Asa na lang sa family o mga anak pag matanda na.

[VeilSpy]

"Good stable job is a thing of the past"

Good stable Job is still a good stable Job.

It can NOT be a thing of the past. President ng GSIS is a good stable Job. Judges Doctors lawyers teachers.  If Good stable jobs is a thing of the past wala na tayung schools teaching economics, Marketing, Math Science etc etc.

I think you're missing out bro, yes it is true that " a good stable job" is still a good job. but certainly that depends on your WANTS and DREAMS.

If kuntento ka na sa na aafford ng salary mo then good for you diba, some people have bigger dreams for theirselve and their families, they wouldnt like to wait until 65 to enjoy their life, (via their Pension).

business owners > employees.

all the time.

[Ilonggo-by-blood]

I think you're missing out bro, yes it is true that " a good stable job" is still a good job. but certainly that depends on your WANTS and DREAMS.

If kuntento ka na sa na aafford ng salary mo then good for you diba, some people have bigger dreams for theirselve and their families, they wouldnt like to wait until 65 to enjoy their life, (via their Pension).

business owners > employees.

all the time.

Yes that is the point... so the statement "Good stable job is a thing of the past" is NOT applicable here in general... Some people could have their  wants and dreams in a good stable job. So it's not a thing of the past. It is more of What type of job you have.

I have nothing against new money earning scheme. I am all for it actually bu saying "Good stable job is a thing of the past" is not really True.

[VeilSpy]

Yes that is the point... so the statement "Good stable job is a thing of the past" is NOT applicable here in general... Some people could have their  wants and dreams in a good stable job. So it's not a thing of the past. It is more of What type of job you have.

I have nothing against new money earning scheme. I am all for it actually bu saying "Good stable job is a thing of the past" is not really True.

Kaw na rin nagsabi. "SOME people". See not all people are CEOs, CFOs, or VPs.  What i am trying to point out here is, sa PANAHON NGAYON, HINDI NA SAPAT na MAY MAGANDANG TRABAHO KA LANG. We must have other line of income stream to be able to survive lalo na kung pamilyado ka na at kung may 3 anak ka pa.  Others do have other income line via Stock Market, mutual funds/bonds, franchising, online selling, etc. etc.. Kahit sina Josiah Go, at Robert Kiyosaki mismo ang nagsabi na in order to be successful kelangan mo ng ownership. 

[Ilonggo-by-blood]

Kaw na rin nagsabi. "SOME people". See not all people are CEOs, CFOs, or VPs.  What i am trying to point out here is, sa PANAHON NGAYON, HINDI NA SAPAT na MAY MAGANDANG TRABAHO KA LANG. We must have other line of income stream to be able to survive lalo na kung pamilyado ka na at kung may 3 anak ka pa.  Others do have other income line via Stock Market, mutual funds/bonds, franchising, online selling, etc. etc.. Kahit sina Josiah Go, at Robert Kiyosaki mismo ang nagsabi na in order to be successful kelangan mo ng ownership. 

ewan ko kung nag kaka intindihan tayu but the point is yung statement na "Good stable job is a thing of the past" is not applicable in General sabi ko it could be applicable for some. It is applicable for me I agree with that No issue but NOT for all. So dapat hindi "Good stable job is a thing of the past" but it should be said with partiality. Kasi it is NOT for all.

[VeilSpy]

ewan ko kung nag kaka intindihan tayu but the point is yung statement na

"Good stable job is a thing of the past" is not applicable in General sabi ko it could be applicable for some. It is applicable for me I agree with that No issue but NOT for all. So dapat hindi "Good stable job is a thing of the past" but it should be said with partiality. Kasi it is NOT for all.

Anu daw paps? parang nahilo ako sa statement mo...

MAJORITY po ang tinutukoy ko dito, paki basa nalang ulit ang nasa taas na post ko.

Sa panahon ngayon, kung ikaw ay isang ordinaryong mamayan lang(MAJORITY,which we are REFERRING), Hindi na sapat ang pagkakaroon ng isang magandang trabaho lang upang makapag provide ka sa pamilya mo, lalo na kung may asawa't anak ka na.

Ngayon siguro mabubuhay ka ng matiwasay kung ang good stable job mo ay isa sa mga halimbawa: una, Kung ikaw ay presidente ng isang companya, CFO ng companya ng langis, Bise presidente ng Meralco o San Miguel,  Gobernador/ Meyor etc. etc. at iba pang halimbawa ng trabaho na wala pa sa  1% ng buong populasyon ng bansa. (ITS NOT FOR ALL SCENARIO)

Ayan po tagalog na. 

[juan pablo]

@VeilSpy

I think @Ilonggo-by-blood was referring to the TS' opening statement, a "good stable job is a thing of the past", and not about the minority not having a good stable job. I think his point is that a good stable job is not a thing of the past, you may not have one but certainly someone still has a good stable job like the examples provided in this thread. It was all about the way the TS seemed to imply that a good stable job doesn't exist anymore (for all kinds of people) which as pointed out it still does.

I think if the statement was "for some people, a good stable job is a thing of the past", then @Ilonggo-by-blood would not be disputing the TS' statement.

[Ilonggo-by-blood]

@VeilSpy

I think @Ilonggo-by-blood was referring to the TS' opening statement, a "good stable job is a thing of the past", and not about the minority not having a good stable job. I think his point is that a good stable job is not a thing of the past, you may not have one but certainly someone still has a good stable job like the examples provided in this thread. It was all about the way the TS seemed to imply that a good stable job doesn't exist anymore (for all kinds of people) which as pointed out it still does.

I think if the statement was "for some people, a good stable job is a thing of the past", then @Ilonggo-by-blood would not be disputing the TS' statement.

yun na nga yun. sorry my Tagalog is as bad as my Ex GF.